Radically Christian Cafe Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory log in | sign up | search | faq | recent topics | forum index
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
R C Cafe » Eldership » Age or Office? » Leadership
 - Email this page to someone.    
Author Leadership
Irnawan
      Jakarta, Indonesia


 - posted      Profile for Irnawan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dear brothers and sisters,
This is part of our writings that concern about
building Organism Leadership Network. As you read this
article, may God bless you and gives you the spirit of
wisdom and revelation, so that you can know Him more
and more. And also feel free to email me...

Organism Leadership Network
Definition
In the dictionary, organism means living creature with
its members cooperate together. The meaning of
living creature here means an existence having a life.
So, human being, animal and plants included in living
creature. We use the term of organism, as the church
is living. But it is necessary to consider that
church life is not a life taken by natural man. In
Greek, there are 3 words used to explain life. First,
bios means a kind of life with general meaning.

The Lord Jesus used this word when commented on the
offering of a widow. The second, psuche that means
kind of human life. Third, zoe which means kind of
God's life. Church is people who are living the zoe,
and growing to be God man by the power of zoe's life
transformation. So, the organism we mean is human
with zoe life. We use the organism term to remind the
people that the church is not an organization. Because
the organization places people in a "box" according to
functions and duties, and makes a command line in
order that a certain "box" knows to whom it is
responsible, and also knows who will be responsible to
him. Authority of a certain "box" merely depends on
its position in an organizational structure. One's
ministry also depends on his position in the
organizational structure. Not only authority and
services, but also the glory and other blessings also
very depends on his position in the structure. In such
conditions, it is not relevant anymore of people in a
certain "box" ask about God's wills, life led by the
Spirit, or follow the Lamb wherever He may go. These
conditions are not like church explained in Acts,
where people follow the Lord and led by Holy Spirit.
So, the church is an organism, not organization.

The use of organism term also intended to explain the
kind of relationship existed among the church members,
and more specifically among the leaders. The
relationship existed among the fellow church members
is not the kind of relationship among the fellow
organization members, but the kind of "hand - foot"
relationship.

"Foot - hand" relationship occurs as both of them are
members of an organism, and also because both of them
absolutely under the control of the head. This
relationship is so harmonious, so there is no conflict
at all between the two. The moves of foot and hand,
absolutely controlled by the head. Foot is not
controlled by the hand and reverse. All the
arrangement come from the head, but between foot and
hand there is relationship mutually to built, equip,
submit and love each other. The "mutual" relationship
like this should exist among the church members. In
the understanding like this we can understand why
Jesus said, "And do not be called teachers; for One
is your Teacher, the Christ." [Matthew 23:10]. By this
words, Jesus was not to teach that the church does
not need a leader in this world but Christ. But He
stressed that "......you are all brethren" [verse 8].
"Mutual" relationship, "foot - hand" relationship and
"you are all brethren" relationship only possible if
the nature of the church which is an organism should
not be contradicted, meaning that it is not treated
as organization. When the church is treated as an
organization, then it damage the nature of the
church, and the relationship among the its fellow
members as well.

"Church " members relationship treated as organization
is clergy-laity relationship, not the organism
relationship. This is the matter hated by Jesus
Christ, where in Revelation 2:6 revealed with the
Nicolaus term. The term of Nicolaus derived from niko
word, meaning to conquer, and laos which means
layman. So Nicolaus means to conqueror the laymen.
They who understand the organization would know that
in an organization there is the authority sharing such
so it creates "superior-subordinate" relationship, or
we called before, namely "clergy-laity" relationship.
So organizing the church is not a trivial matter. We
need to know what behind the such act. Indeed, it
is realized or not, organizing a church is the act of
the leaders to subdue and control the congregation.

While, the term of meant leadership is the ability to
lead. As the church leader is Jesus Christ the Lord,
then what we mean church "leaders" are not other than
servants of Jesus Christ, gifted with the ability to
lead. And because the church is an organism, then the
ability to lead the church AS AN ORGANISM. This
organism leaders is invariably different with
organizational leaders, as its different kind of
authority and focus. Authority of an organism leaders
comes from zoe life, while the authority of the
organizational leaders come from their positions in
the structure. The organizational leadership puts
very emphasis and focus on the ability to make
planning, organizing, directing and controlling,
while the organism leadership focused on building the
relationship in the zoe life context, so that the
church grows in zoe life. It means the church is
increasingly closer and knows zoe life who is Jesus
Christ Himself. The organizational leadership is goal
oriented and people oriented or their combination,
while the organism leadership is Christ oriented.

The leaders of early church are organism leaders.
Peter, Paul and John were the very Christ oriented
leaders, and focused on the zoe life growth. All of
them did not build an organization, and neither lived
or serve in organizational context. Some say that
Jesus was an organizational leader as He has a
treasurer named Jude. If it was true, then Jesus was a
very bad organizational leader, as He did not let His
organization's money stolen continuously by the
dishonest treasurer Jude. It is ridiculous! Some say
that Acts 6:1-5 is the confirmation and approval of
the early church leaders on the need of organization,
to handle the offering distribution to widows. But if
considered thoroughly, Acts 6:1-6, does not talk
about organization at all, but only job sharing in
organism. Just like hand and foot have their own
tasks and functions, the same with this member of
community [church in Jerusalem] had their own
functions. In Acts 6:1-6, functions of each member of
community were clarified and distributed, in order to
handle existing problem. A par of organism members
function as the table servant, some others function as
preachers. So Acts 6:1-6, does not talk about an
organization at all but functions. Even actually the
term of organization is not found in the Scripture.
This term comes from the man governmental system, not
God's. So all the leaders of early church were the
organism leaders. All of them applied the organism
leadership principles.

Thus far has been explained the meaning of organism
and leadership terms. Now will be explain the meaning
of network term in its relation with organism leader.
The network meant is connected system. The organism
leadership is a system. Meaning that all things
conducted by organism leadership team, either in
literature, teaching, and visitation, retreat,
seminar, training, or implementing "tent making"
projects [as Paul the Tent Maker]interrelated and was
a unit, became a leadership system, with the purpose
to impart the vision, mission, and zoe life spirit for
the church for his growth. But it is necessary to
remember that the organism leadership system is a
related system, in the meaning that between one
organism leadership team and other organism leadership
team, have an organic relationship and interrelated
to be an organism leadership connected system. For
instance there is organic relationship [fellowship]
between "Paul" [in Antioch] leadership team and
"Peter" [in Jerusalem] leadership team, which they
confirmed by hand shaking [Galatians 2:9]. Certainly
still there other organism leadership teams, but they
have organic relationship one another.

So the term Organism Leadership Network is a
relationship organic in nature, between one organism
leadership team and other organism leadership team.
This relationship is very important to the growth of
The Body of Christ, as shown in the relations "nerves
and joints" as meant in Colossian 2:19 namely
relationship supporting and binding to be one.

"Stars" Woman Revelation 12.

As stated before that the final destiny of the church
as symbolized by the woman Revelation 12 is delivering
matured Sons of God. What kind of church, or more
precisely, what kind of community, which finally can
produce matured Sons of God.

As we know that Revelation reveals that something with
the symbol language, the same with this woman
Revelation 12, full of symbols revealing the kind of
community intended to. In Revelation 12:1 says: "Now a
great sign appeared in heaven: a women clothed with
the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head
a garland of twelve stars." What reality is revealed
by sun, moon, and especially these 12 stars?

If we look at back to Malachi 4:2 there written, "But
to you who fear of My name the Sun of Righteousness
shall arise ......." As community symbolized with woman
Revelation 12, can be called the community who fear of
Lord Name, and sun our true truth is Christ, then can
be concluded that the sun in Revelation 12, is Christ,
as the light for the community who fear of His Name.

While light of the moon is the reflection light. It
means the light of moon, only the "shadow" of the true
sun light, as revealed through Torah with all its
laws. Because in Colossians 2:16-17 there written,
".....in food and in drink, or regarding a festival or a
new moon or sabbath. Which are the shadow of things to
come, but the substance is of Christ". So moon in
Revelation 12, can be understood as Torah, complete
with all its law regarding food, drink, festival and
so forth.

Symbol of woman in Revelation 12:1, clothed with sun,
where the moon is under her feed. It means that
community symbolized by this woman, abundantly filled
by Holy Spirit, so she does not live in the "shadow"
realm of Torah with all its laws. When the church
started to fall and Christ's reality increasingly
faded away, then the service patterns in The Old
Testament entered. Church was increasingly busy with
"worship" routines of Old Testament style, while
experience with Christ disappeared. Even the
fundamental experience, such as rebirth also departed
the church.

Furthermore, this woman crowned with 12 stars on her
head. Then this stars symbol, explained in Revelation
1:20; where the stars mean the angels of the
congregation. The angels here should not of celestial
beings, as the true mean of angels here are messenger.
As the seven epistles in Revelation chapter 2 and 3,
especially addressed to these "stars", then can be
concluded that the "stars" meant here are the leaders
of congregation.

While number 12 in the Scripture refers to divine
government. By 12 tribes of Israel, 12 Apostles of the
Lamb, and 12 gates of New Jerusalem and 12 angels on
her, all these reveal that 12 is concerning the divine
government.

Community symbolized by the woman of this Revelation
12 is under a divine leadership. Though this
community is a divine organism which all its members
are directly under the control of the Head, but it
does not mean without man leadership. Only it needs to
be remember that the man "stars" are not
organizational leadership, and do not take authority
on the congregation because of their positions in an
organization. Community symbolized by the woman of
this Revelation 12 is not moving and living in
organization realm, as she is a divine organism. So
this "stars" control his leadership on the community
of "woman Revelation 12", with divine authority, and
not organizational authority.

How this "stars" human get his divine authority? By
these "stars" unite such so they form a crown, meaning
that the unity of these "stars" result in divine
authority. The organism leaders move and control their
leadership in team, where each its members has organic
relationship one another. It is the organic
relationship among these organism leaders that produce
authority to serve the church. If the organic
relationship among these leaders changed to
organizational leadership, then divine authority
existed among them will loss.

This organism leadership is a team leadership in the
mean of egalitarian, namely all its member are equal.
There is no term of senior, the first among equals,
team leader, team coordinator, or the like. These
terms only applicable and exist in organizational
context, not in organism context. It does not mean
there is no organism leaders who more gifted, more
matured in the zoe life growth, more experienced, more
knowledgeable from others. But this means all is
fellow brethren in real meaning, and become servant
one another, and mutually equipped, and there nobody
dominated, controls, more than anything else to take
advantage of others for his benefits.

The impact of this organism leadership is very great
namely the delivering of matured sons of God "who was
to rule all nations with a rod of iron..." [Revelation
12:5]. This organism leadership that will present the
kingdom of God on the earth.

Form of Cooperation

Cooperation meant here is necessary to understand in
its ideal form, and also in its form which in process
toward its ideal form [still in its original form].
It is true that perfect cooperation form will occur
naturally, if the kind of organic and egalitarian
relationship, as well as the unity among these
organism leaders have achieved their ideal form, as
symbolized by "the stars" in Revelation 12. If its
ideal level achieved, then the cooperation form among
the organism leader has been like "hand-foot"
relationship in the one body. The cooperation of "hand
- foot" so harmonious, flowing, and perfectly mutual
equipped. But it is necessary to consider that the
ideal form of cooperation like this "hand - foot", is
not possible to achieve without a process. So it needs
to understand its ideal form. And also its form which
is in process.

What described here is the cooperation of the organism
leaders in its original form. In fact the spiritual
leaders today have possessed their own ministry they
opened. Or if this community we call house church,
then each leader has had their own "house". How should
be the initial form of cooperation among the leaders
having their own "house", in order that each leader
does not feel his house interrupted or suffers loss ?
As we are convinced that the cooperation in the Lord
should produce additional benefits, as it is written,
"..... one chases a thousand, and two put ten thousand
to flight ..." [Deuteronomy 32:30]. So the additional
benefits as the result of two persons cooperate,
according to this verse, is eight thousand. Then the
cooperation in the Lord, surely makes each part to
enjoy additional benefits, and nobody harmed.

Here will be suggested a initial form of leader
cooperation in order that it always produces
additional benefits. The first needed is the
existence of round table meeting, namely a meeting
where each leader can share the words and experiences,
without no body to "dominates". This round table
meeting performed according to joint agreement, either
time, place or other things. Besides this round table
meeting, the leaders are better as frequently as
possible communicate, either through telephone, sms,
email, or maybe group email. Through this sharing
process, the leaders are expected to grow in a
unity, egalitarianism, and in building organic
relationship one another. Maybe also, two or several
leaders run a "tent making" project as Paul and
Akwila did in Corinthians [Acts 18:3]. All these can
become a means to achieve the ideal form of
cooperation among the organism leaders.

If we lend the term of IGMN [Integrated Global Mission
Network], actually we are building a cooperation form
of "fish net" [centerless) and not "spider web"
[center]. It means every leader can cooperate, without
a central leader who controls. But form of cooperation
of the organism leader (Organism Leadership Network],
but is different with IGMN model. This existence
resulted in IGMN model exists in organization
context, while OLN exists in the organism context or
body.

Finally, we need to always remember it in order that
we continuously is not in its initial form and
experience stagnation. As our purpose is to achieve
its ideal form, in order that the church in the end of
this age may produce mature sons of God, and to reign
with Jesus Christ on the earth for the glory of the
Father.
Echoes From Zion Ministry.

   

Quick Reply
Message:

 
Formatting Code


 


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
      
Hop To:
      


contact us | housechurch.org | privacy policy

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3