To Bruce, I followed your advice and found at least a reference to "Men who would be kings" and "A non-ecclisiastic New Testament". Anyone interested to know the truth of what I say can find them too, at [url]http://hometown.aol.com/egweimi/rel.htm[/url].However, there's one MAJOR problem! The article "Men Who would be Kings" is a strict non-charismatic article, to the premises of which I completely disagree. Of course there are different views on this subject, however to a charismatic christian, this is hardly to be taken seriously. And much worse, other articles on the page reflects a non-trinitarian view, neglects the Great Commission and advocates other unbiblical views.
I sincerily hope that this does not reflect the position of any major part of the house church movement! It is absolutely essential what roots lies behind any view or doctrine. Anyone who agrees with me on this one is most welcome to voice their support!
Email this page to someone.
