House Church Talk - Passion

[Janet Murphy]

 I think the key word to what DavidA said - was that it would be "talking
> points" addition to homechurching discussions...  and I read no
endorsements
> to what Pro Preacher was actually saying, when he said downloads were too
> big to actually hear...

Correct, not casting any bad vibes towards David.  He has been a cyber
friend for about 5 years now and I have alot of respect for him.
Lots of good common sense from him.

janet
www.janetmurphy.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jim pierceall" <jpierceall at brtc.net>
To: "House Church Talk" <House Church Talk  at housechurch.org>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: House Church Talk -  Passion


> Hi Janet, RJ and list talkers....  I appreciated much of what you shared,
> and found agreement.. but rather than just applaud that - allow me expand
> some?
>
> I think the key word to what DavidA said - was that it would be "talking
> points" addition to homechurching discussions...  and I read no
endorsements
> to what Pro Preacher was actually saying, when he said downloads were too
> big to actually hear...
>
> I couldn't handle the whole download either, but read the running
commentary
> of what others were saying...  For the most part sad....O:>(
>
> My immediate first thought was, all we need is one more Pro Preacher, from
a
> Superior/High and Lifted Up Podium, telling the sheep's "what and how" to
> believe ...  Ironically, not dissimilar to a "Pope in his own right".. ha!
> Substituting his voice for the One that would teach us...
>
> But discourse and discussion is Good...  Where the plentiful errors, might
> be discussed or elaborated concerning - and we ALL participate and learn
in
> that process...  dare I call it ecclesia-ing...? O;>)
>
> Here's one for consideration and I hope others weigh in...:
>
> In the movie, a special cross of saw millrd lumber, was used for Yeshua to
> carry.  While the other two, were given rough hewn cross members only.  We
> trust that to be an inaccuracy don't we?  And why?
>
> Who was the cross prepared for?  I mean it was standing ready for
another...
> In the rush (12 hours and really less) the Romans already had three cross
> members prepared for that "penalty day" didn't they?  And once "one walk
> free" Jesus assumed his place - with no time for special preparations...
>
> Who was the one that the cross prepared for that day?  Thoughts and
> comments?
>
> JimP - kentucky
>
> <How could these words be improved?>
>
> When I survey the wondrous cross
> On which the Prince of glory died,
> My richest gain I count but loss,
> And pour contempt on all my pride.
>
>
>
>
>