House Church Talk - A vision of women and silence in the church
Bruce Woodford
bwood4d at hotmail.com
Thu May 13 04:37:56 EDT 2004
Hi Sean (and all),
Please forgive me for this double post. Having read the previous one, I
realized it was full of typos and I'd failed to make a couple of comments
that I'd intended. Please just erase the previous one!
Thanks, Sean, for your thoughtful questions in your post which I am copying
here and inserting answers as I understand the issues.[My comments will be
in brackets.] I, with you, believe that scripture is to be understood for
what it says. I'm also convinced that scripture never contradicts itself.
So if two scriptural statements seem (to me) to be contradictory, my
understanding has gone wrong at one point or another.
You wrote:"As I stated previously, I understand Jesus to say in Mat thew 18
that were two or three are gathered we have a church." [I agree with you.]
You wrote:"Titus 2:3-5 and 1 Timothy 2:12 create a tension that encourages
older women to instruct younger women in matters of the home (for lack of a
better description), clearly this must involve speaking." [You are
absolutely right there!]
You wrote:"The instruction in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 seems to plainly mean
that women are not to speak. I don't think this can be limited to whole
church gatherings as the preceding verse points out that these instructions
are for all the churches of the saints." [I would submit to you that this is
where you thinking may be wrong. "As in all churches of the saints" is NOT a
phrase that occurs in verse 23 or in verse 37 as if it applied all the
regulations of 23-40 to "all churches of the saints". Rather that phrase is
in verse 33 where it modifies one specific statement..."For God is not the
author of confusion but of peace." In like manner, the instruction to
tongues speaking brothers , "Let him keep silence in the church", is not an
instruction across the board, as it were, but rather simply applies to the
immediately preceding phrase...."If there be no interpretter..."]
You wrote:"So when two or three Christian women come together over coffee at
Starbucks, what do they do? If that is not a church meeting then what makes
it different? Could two single missionary women in Africa not meet without
finding a man to do the speaking? This isn't a snide question, I'm just
having trouble making all the plain readings fit together." [Re, the women
at Starbucks: the older should teach the younger as you have noted above,
they all should exhort one another, and stir up one another to love and good
works, they should love one another, edify one another, minister their gifts
one to another as good stewards of the manifold grace of God etc etc. To do
so would not in any way violate I Cor.14:34,35 even if men were present with
them! NOWHERE IN SCRIPTURE ARE WOMEN TAUGHT TO BE SILENT (the not to speak
variety) EXCEPT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WHOLE CHURCH IN A CITY COMING TOGETHER
INTO ONE PLACE.]
You wrote:"Honestly, my wife would prefer not having the pressure to
contribute beyond materially to our weekly gatherings. However she has
expressed confusion at how her silent presence could edify and build up the
body." [Very good thinking on her part! If she would feel "under pressure
to contribute" it may be possible that her idea of participation is not
linked with what her particular spiritual gift(s) is(are)! An eye never
feels pressured to see, nor does an ear feel pressured to hear! Those are
the things they normally and naturally do! If she feels pressured to teach
but her gift is not teaching but rather shewing mercy, or hospitality , or
exhortation, her job is not to do someone else's ministry, but the unique
ministry for which God has equipped her! BTW, what scripture would teach us
to have "weekly gatherings" (Acts 2:46; Heb.3:13) and "to contribute
materially to our weekly gatherings"? Does not I Cor.16:1,2 teach a
personal "laying by in store" rather than a corporate one??]
You wrote:"Silence is silence, so if scripture really says that, should the
singing be all male? Especially since Colossians 3:16 would imply that one
of the primary purposes of singing in the meeting is to teach one another."
[There ARE church meetings where "one anothering" is the order of the day!
(Heb.10:24,25) But the whole church kind of meeting regulated in I Cor
14:23-40 is NOT such a meeting!!! If you look at whole church meetings
recorded in scripture you will never find congregational singing,
congregational tongues speaking, congregational praying etc! There must
only be one person speaking at a time in whole church meetings, and singing
IS "SPEAKING" (laleo)! BUT, those kinds of activities (along with breaking
of bread, women speaking etc ARE CHARACTERISTIC OF HOUSE CHURCH GATHERINGS!]
You write:"So putting this all together, my vision would be that the
decision making part of the meeting should be distinguished from the rest.
This is drawing on the roots of the word ekklesia and stating that women
should be silent in that process as we see in Acts 15:6-23 but that for the
rest of the gathering they are encouraged to participate as parts of the
body, praying and prophesying and instructing the younger women as mentioned
above but leaving the teaching of doctrine and exercising of church
authority to the men. I'm curious how others who take the plain reading of 1
Corinthians 14:34-35 might see this walked out? Please let me know. [Sean,
do you see any recorded church meetings in scripture divided up as you have
suggested? i.e. "Decision making part" in which women are silent and
non-decision making part in which women do participate vocally???
Personally, I do not see any such example in scripture. Rather in meetings
where women participated vocally, they could do so from start to finish. But
in whole church gatherings, they were silent from start to finish and had to
wait till they got home even to ask their husbands questions! As I have
been seeking to communicate on this matter the last few weeks, I am
convinced that the only way to consistently apply and be obedient to all the
relevant scriptural instructions is to take note of the context of I
Cor.14:23-40 (when the whole city church is come together into one place)
and not attempt to force those regulations upon participants in any other
kind of church meeting.]
Does this help?
Your brother in Christ,
Bruce
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN Premium
House Church Talk is sponsored by the House Church Network.
House Church Talk has been renamed. These discussions, via the web, now occur at the Radically Christian Cafe.