House Church Talk - Pattern or simply an adaptation?
Bruce Woodford
bwood4d at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 24 11:21:11 EST 2004
Hi Cliff,
You posed a couple of excellent questions!"I occasionally wonder if the
church in its infancy should look like the church in its maturity?"
Like our physical bodies, the church has many members linked to one Head and
to each other. The body of a newborn baby is complete, has unity amongst
it's members right from the start and all are linked to the head. But
newborn babies do NOT behave like mature adults! As an infant grows and
matures, its' members become more and more profficient at relating one to
another and ministering to each other.
But in the church, it seems that our relational capabilities have decreased
rather than developed! We seem to relate less (more poorly) on a personal
level (one anothering), on a gathering level (ministering of gifts to each
other as good stewards of the manifold grace of God), on a community level
(being together of one accord) and on an international scale of ministry
amongst churches of many nations, than did the believers and churches of the
first century.
Have been pondering these things a lot lately and I'm wondering if at least
a couple of root problems (which mitigate against liberty in our
relationships) may include the following:
(a) A limitted appreciation of the cross and the fact that we are crucified
to the world and the world to us (Gal.6:14)...resulting in self-motivation
and an obligation based religiosity which breeds critical spirits ands
results in rejection and many broken relationships.
(b)An almost universally accepted denominationalism which controls and
separates various sections of the body from the others and prohibits
ministry between them.
(2)You also asked:"If all of a sudden all the Christians started meeting in
homes across the world, would God desire us to form relationships between
the different cities and counties and what would
they look like?"
Brother Cliff, just as God never instructs us to "organize" unity or "form"
unity, but simply to keep/guard the unity which He has established
(Eph.4:3), I don't think our responsibility is to form relationships between
gatherings, cities, counties etc, but rather to ACKNOWLEDGE that those
relationships have always existed, but we have been denying them,
restricting them, and prohibitting them through our own self-interest,
desire for control and unwillingness to minister to or be ministered to by
believers from differing backgrounds.
Many truths of scripture which are FACTS (i.e. forgiveness, justification,
sanctification, our death and quickening with Christ and our being raised up
to sit with Him in heavenly places) can only be enjoyed and appreciated when
we actually TRUST God that what He has said about them is bedrock-solid
fact. In like manner, the unity of the Spirit in the Body is an established
fact, but only as we practically acknowledge that it is so in our
relationships with the Father, the Son, the Spirit and with our brothers and
sisters in Christ will we ever practically ENJOY the facts!
This is my present perception of the problem. What are your thoughts?
Your brother in Christ,
Bruce
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
House Church Talk is sponsored by the House Church Network.
House Church Talk has been renamed. These discussions, via the web, now occur at the Radically Christian Cafe.