House Church Talk - Re: Pattern or simply an adaptation?

[R.L. Johnson]

Dan,

I learned a long time ago that I would not argue points on the internet that
I probably would argue in person.

You see, email is the poorest form of communication.  You can not hear the
tone of voice or see body language.
If you study communication, you will realize these components make up well
over 50% of the communication process.

Since I do no know Brother Cliff, I do not feel it is worth the possible
hurt and bruised feelings.  I do not feel Brother Cliff is trying to
misguide anyone nor do I feel this issue is important to our salvation
doctrine.  If this was about salvation, you would see a totally different
point of view on my part.  Since it is a very minor secondary Therefore, no
harm, no foul.

RJOHNSON
ccnn-Owner at yahoogroups.com
ccnn-subscribe at yahoogroups.com





-----Original Message-----
From: House Church Talk -bounces at housechurch.org
[mailto:House Church Talk -bounces at housechurch.org]On Behalf Of flash
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:35 PM
To: House Church Talk  at housechurch.org
Subject: House Church Talk -  Re: Pattern or simply an adaptation?


Brother RJ - am I amiss in what I am hearing?

We are brethren seeking understanding of what you say and it is beyond you
nor interesting for
you to get for us?  That can only mean it is not realistic and not biblical?
I have lost track
of the tenor or thread of this conversation you were undertaking with
brother Cliff, but this
sounds like a cheap doctrine or teaching using this type of language and
justification.  I am
sorry if I am taking this incorrectly...

That is how I am seeing it - and I am rong bunches of times.  I just don't
like for brethren to
do this to each other.

Dan ChicagoArea