House Church Talk - Re: Real Christians
Bruce Woodford
bwood4d at hotmail.com
Sun Sep 26 14:07:38 EDT 2004
Hi Jim P,
I'm very sorry that I've taken so long to reply to your questions of a few
days ago. But our daughter just got married yesterday and so the last few
days have been pretty hectic around here!
You wrote:"Interesting Bruce... hummmm? <<> Does any one else have any
thoughts or observations in this regard?>> Well only because you asked...
<smile> <<> In EVERY city where 2 or more men went to preach the gospel as a
> co-operative enterprise, there were ALWAYS churches established. However
in > the Book of Acts, there is NOT EVEN ONE city where just ONE MAN WENT
ALONE > where a church was ever established.>> Not being confrontational -
not one iota, Bruce... Yet, I want to add, how many "churches are there?"
There is one church which is the Body of Christ and of which every child of
God is a member including those saved at Lydda, Joppa Athens etc. But there
are also many "churches of God" but only ONE church of God in any given
city. Every church of God includes every saint, every child of God in that
particular city regardless of whether they gather together or even know of
one another! So yes, as soon as people were saved in Lydda, Joppa, Athens
etc there were churches of God in those places composed of those regenerate
people in those places.
However, the church which is Christ's Body has never yet been gathered
together. There are many cities in which the church of God has never yet
been gathered together! So the churches to which I was referring were
functioning, gathering, relating companies of saints.
You continued:"If you say - One! - we maybe won't quickly dismiss, that when
<<(i.e Peter went alone to Lydda and Joppa, some were healed and some were
saved, but we never read of churches in those places.>> ...that the church
<singular> was being increased... Maybe if we said, the Kingdom of God on
Earth was being advanced...? As the "church" <read as> "people", not earthen
exterior forms, models, formats, patterns was being sown and deposited as
the Holy Spirit saw fit."
Yes, Jim, as I mention above, I agree with you that the church which is
Christ's Body, and that the Kingdom of God are being advanced and expanded
where ever people are saved. I'm not defining "church" by exterior forms,
models, formats etc. but rather, as scripture refers to them as relating,
gathering, functioning companies of saints.
You continued:" I suppose the reason I even bring this up - is that IF we
only think in terms of an observable physical format, we might miss the
deposit He has seen fit to establish... I think that is the history... a
pitfall to be guarded against... imo... .... and Bruce, what would you make
of the account of Acts 10... The angel said to send and bring back a single
individual - Peter... Not Peter and ??? Though companions went along,
doesn't appear they had much input, at least not enough that the Holy Spirit
<God> would see necessity to have it recorded, so that a full fledged
"non-optional pattern" of always a two-some would be forever called for...
Would you say, that as Peter and companions departed, a church was
established there?"
No brother, I did not claim that churches were formed immediately in places
where two or more men went together. I have only observed that functioning,
gathering churches of which scripture speaks all seem to be the result of
the co-operative enterprise of 2 or more.
You concluded as follows:"Sometimes the Holy Spirit might say, separate unto
me, Paul and Bruce, for a task/assignment I have laid out for them... yet
again, maybe He might likewise, prepare an individual, even by vision, for a
task of significance... Obedience to His leading, seems to be the greater
"pattern"... no matter, how we - as Peter - resist by our former patterns
(mindsets)... ha!"
I have no doubt that God often calls lone individuals to tasks and
assignments that are uniquely theirs to fulfill. I don't question that at
all. Both Peter's assignment in John 21 and Paul's in Acts 9:15,16 were
unique. BUT, their success or lack thereof in seeing functioning, gathering
churches begun seems to be directly linked to whether or not they worked
side by side with others in the task of Gospel testimony.
Does this clarify anything or does it seem inconsistent with what you read
in scripture?
Your brother in Christ,
Bruce
_________________________________________________________________
MSN® Calendar keeps you organized and takes the effort out of scheduling
get-togethers.
Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the
first two months FREE*.
House Church Talk is sponsored by the House Church Network.
House Church Talk has been renamed. These discussions, via the web, now occur at the Radically Christian Cafe.